Serie B - Italy
Feb 27, 6:00 PM ET UPCOMING

Virtus Entella

2W-8L
VS

Monza

7W-3L
Spread -0.8
Total 2.25
Win Prob 75.9%
Odds format

Virtus Entella vs Monza Odds, Picks & Predictions — Friday, February 27, 2026

Monza’s rolling, Entella’s reeling, and the market’s pricing a near-routine home result. Here’s where the real value might hide.

ThunderBet ThunderBet
Feb 24, 2026 Updated Feb 24, 2026

Odds Comparison

82+ sportsbooks
Bovada
ML
Spread -0.75 +0.75
Total 2.25
Pinnacle
ML
Spread -0.75 +0.75
Total 2.25
BetRivers
ML
Spread --
Total 2.5
BetMGM
ML
Spread --
Total 2.5

1) The angle: Monza’s “business trip” game… with a revenge wrinkle

On paper, Virtus Entella at Monza looks like one of those Friday Serie B spots where the home side just handles it and you move on. Monza’s sitting in that promotion-chase gear, and Entella’s been playing like a team counting down the match minutes. But the reason this matchup is actually interesting for bettors is the way the market is pricing “certainty” while still leaving pockets of disagreement across books.

Monza comes in hot (last five: W-W-D-W-W), and they’ve been winning the games you’re supposed to win—tight, controlled, low-drama results like the 1–0 away at Carrarese and the 2–1 home wins over Juve Stabia and Avellino. Entella, meanwhile, is dragging a two-match skid and just ate back-to-back heavy losses (1–3 at home to Catanzaro, 0–3 away to Palermo). That contrast is exactly why you’re seeing Monza priced like a heavy favorite everywhere.

The “wrinkle” is that Entella did take the first meeting earlier in the season—different venue, different context, but bettors love a bogey-team narrative. That’s the kind of storyline that can keep the away price a touch fatter than pure form would suggest, especially when public money is leaning home. If you’re searching “Virtus Entella vs Monza odds” or “Monza Virtus Entella betting odds today,” this is the key: the market is confident on the direction (home), but not perfectly aligned on the size of it.

2) Matchup breakdown: form, ELO, and the one-way traffic problem

Start with the macro: Monza’s ELO is 1544 vs Entella’s 1476. That gap isn’t outrageous on its own, but when you overlay it with current form and goal profiles, it tells a much sharper story. Monza averages 1.6 scored and 0.9 allowed; Entella averages 0.8 scored and 1.3 allowed. That’s basically “can create, can defend” versus “struggles to score, leaks chances.”

Monza’s last 10 is 7W-3L, and the recent pattern matters: they’re not just winning, they’re doing it with control. A 0–0 away at Südtirol mixed in there is the kind of result that screams “professional road point” rather than “we got lucky.” When a team can bank clean-ish performances across different environments, it usually translates well to home matches against the bottom half.

Entella’s last 10 is the bigger red flag: 2W-8L. Even their “not a loss” outcomes lately (1–1 at Spezia, 1–1 vs Frosinone) came in a stretch where the overall trend is negative. And the away profile is brutal: they haven’t won on the road all season (0-4-9). That’s not bad luck anymore—that’s structural. It usually means one of two things: (1) they set up to survive and can’t create enough to steal games, or (2) they open up when they fall behind and get punished. The Palermo 0–3 fits the second script perfectly.

Stylistically, this matchup often turns into one-way traffic if Monza scores first. Monza’s best trait right now is that they don’t need chaos to win—they can win 1–0 or 2–1 and never really feel threatened. For totals bettors, that’s the big question: does Entella contribute anything, or does this become Monza managing the second half after getting in front?

EV Finder Spotlight

Virtus Entella +6.0% EV
h2h at LeoVegas ·
Virtus Entella +6.0% EV
h2h at BetRivers ·
More +EV edges detected across 82+ books +4.1% EV

3) Betting market analysis: where the books agree, where they don’t, and what the exchanges are saying

The moneyline is basically unanimous on “Monza should be favored,” but the price dispersion is telling. You can find Monza as short as {odds:1.50} at BetRivers and as high as {odds:1.64} at Pinnacle, with DraftKings at {odds:1.62} and FanDuel at {odds:1.57}. That’s a pretty meaningful range for a heavy favorite—especially in a three-way market with a draw option. If you’re the type who shops lines (and you should be), this is exactly where line shopping is worth real expected value over a season.

For Entella, the away win price is floating from {odds:5.25} (DraftKings) up to {odds:6.40} (BetRivers), with FanDuel at {odds:5.90} and Pinnacle at {odds:5.59}. That spread tells you books are not perfectly comfortable with how to price the longshot tail. Either they’re managing public exposure differently, or they’re disagreeing on the true upset probability. Either way, that’s where value hunters usually start sniffing around.

The exchange side is even more decisive. ThunderBet’s ThunderCloud exchange consensus has the home side as the ML winner with high confidence, and the implied win probabilities come out Home 75.7% / Away 24.3%. That’s not a “coin flip with a lean.” That’s the market saying: if Entella gets anything here, it’s likely via the draw more than the outright win.

On the handicap, the consensus spread is -0.8 with a model predicted spread of -0.9. That lines up cleanly with the main Asian handicap you’re seeing: Monza -0.75 priced around {odds:1.82} (Bovada) and {odds:1.83} (Pinnacle), with Entella +0.75 around {odds:2.02}/{odds:2.03}. In other words: the “fair” number is basically right on top of the available number. That’s not where you typically find the easiest edge—unless you’re exploiting timing, price swings, or book-specific mispricing.

Totals are where it gets more interesting. The consensus total is 2.25 with a slight lean over, while the model predicted total is 2.5. That half-goal disagreement (2.25 vs 2.5) is exactly the kind of thing that creates tradable value depending on where you can find the line and how it’s priced. You’ll see 2.25 at Pinnacle with Over priced {odds:1.82} and at Bovada with Over priced {odds:2.02}. Meanwhile, some books are hanging 2.5 (BetRivers Over 2.5 at {odds:1.64}, BetMGM Over 2.5 at {odds:2.00}). That’s a huge pricing/line split for the same game state, which tells you the market isn’t fully converged on how goal-rich this should be.

And despite all that, there’s been no significant movement flagged. That matters: when you have disagreement across books but no major drift, it often means the market is waiting for team news, lineup hints, or early sharp action to force convergence. If you want to monitor that, the Odds Drop Detector is built exactly for these “quiet until it isn’t” spots.

4) Value angles: where ThunderBet’s signals are pointing (and why it’s not just “take the favorite”)

If you only bet favorites, you already know the problem: you’re paying tax. The question is whether you’re paying too much tax in this particular matchup. ThunderBet’s AI analysis has confidence at 78/100 with a “Strong” value rating and a lean home—consistent with the exchange consensus. But the smarter way to use that isn’t as a green light to auto-click Monza ML; it’s as a framework for how to express the position.

Here’s what jumps out:

  • Moneyline pricing vs consensus: Pinnacle has Monza ML at {odds:1.64}. BetRivers is down at {odds:1.50}. That difference is massive in long-run ROI terms. If you’re playing ML at all, you want the top of market number, not the “convenience” number.
  • Spread alignment: With the model spread at -0.9 and the market at roughly -0.75, the handicap looks close to efficient. That doesn’t mean “no edge,” it means you need a better price or a better moment. If you can get Monza -0.75 at a friendlier price than the {odds:1.82}/{odds:1.83} range, that’s where it starts to become interesting.
  • Totals disagreement creates leverage: A consensus 2.25 but model 2.5 is the kind of setup where the Trap Detector becomes useful—because books will shade pricing differently to balance action. ThunderBet flagged low-level price divergence traps on both sides of 2.25: Under 2.25 is tagged as “Fade,” while Over 2.25 is tagged “BET” (both with a 42/100 trap score). That’s not a screaming alarm, but it’s a nudge: the sharper pricing is less friendly to the under than what some softer books are offering, which often means the under is the side getting “help” to attract public money.

Now for the counterintuitive part: the only listed +EV opportunities are on Virtus Entella ML—+6.0% at LeoVegas, +6.0% at BetRivers, +6.0% at Grosvenor—flagged by our EV Finder. That doesn’t mean “Entella is likely to win.” It means the price on Entella is inflated enough at certain books that, relative to the market’s true probability (and the sharper reference lines), it can be +EV in a portfolio sense.

This is where serious bettors separate themselves from vibes bettors. A +EV longshot can be a good bet even when it loses most of the time—because you’re getting paid more than you should when it does hit. If you’ve never played that style, ThunderBet’s edge is showing you the math-backed version of “sprinkle,” not the emotional version.

But you should also respect the convergence signals here: exchange consensus is strongly home, and the AI lean is home. When ThunderBet sees that kind of agreement—exchanges + model + form—the “value” is often about structure: using the right market (spread vs ML vs totals), the right book, and the right timing. If you want the full picture—book-by-book deltas, fair lines, and where the market is likely to converge—this is the kind of match where it’s worth unlocking the dashboard via Subscribe to ThunderBet.

Recent Form

Virtus Entella
L
L
W
D
D
vs US Catanzaro 1929 L 1-3
vs Palermo L 0-3
vs Cesena FC W 3-1
vs Spezia D 1-1
vs Frosinone D 1-1
Monza
W
W
D
W
W
vs Carrarese W 1-0
vs Juve Stabia W 2-1
vs Südtirol D 0-0
vs Avellino W 2-1
vs Padova W 2-1
Key Stats Comparison
1476 ELO Rating 1544
0.8 PPG Scored 1.6
1.3 PPG Allowed 0.9
L2 Streak W2
Model Spread: -0.9 Predicted Total: 2.5

Trap Detector Alerts

Under 2.25
LOW
price_divergence Sharp: Soft: 15.3% div.
Fade -- Retail paying 15.3% LESS than Pinnacle fair value | Retail charging ~89¢ more juice (Pinnacle +103 vs Retail -139) | …
Over 2.25
LOW
price_divergence Sharp: Soft: 10.5% div.
BET -- Retail paying 10.5% MORE than Pinnacle - potential value | Retail offering ~52¢ BETTER juice than Pinnacle! (PIN -123 vs …

5) Key factors to watch before you bet: tempo, first goal, and public bias

There are a few practical levers that decide whether this plays like a clean Monza win, a grindy 1–0, or something messier that drags totals and handicaps into coin-flip territory.

  • Entella’s away approach: With a 0-4-9 away record, they’re either coming to bunker or they’re coming to survive until halftime. If they sit deep and Monza is patient, that’s often an under-friendly script early with live-betting opportunities once the match state changes.
  • Monza’s game management: Monza’s recent wins are “controlled.” That can cap totals if they get ahead and throttle down, but it can also create a steady stream of high-quality chances if Entella has to open up late.
  • First-goal gravity: In matches like this, the first goal matters more than usual. If Monza scores first, Entella’s profile suggests they can unravel (see Palermo). If Entella somehow scores first, you’re immediately in “does Monza break down a low block” territory, which is where draws get live.
  • Public bias: ThunderBet has public bias 6/10 toward the home side. That’s not extreme, but it’s enough that you can see books shading Monza shorter (like the {odds:1.50} at BetRivers). If you’re betting Monza, don’t donate value—shop the best number.
  • Late news and line moves: No significant movement yet. That’s a yellow light to wait if you can—especially for totals. Keep an eye on the Odds Drop Detector in the hours leading up; Serie B lines can jump fast when starting XIs or striker availability becomes clearer.

If you want a tailored breakdown—like “what does Monza -0.75 mean for my bankroll?” or “which book is currently hanging the softest total?”—ask the AI Betting Assistant and it’ll walk you through the exact markets and pricing in plain English.

6) How to think about your bet slip for Virtus Entella vs Monza

If you came here searching “Virtus Entella vs Monza picks predictions,” the best advice is to treat this as a market-efficiency puzzle, not a gut-feel game. The direction is obvious: Monza is in better form, higher ELO, better scoring/defending rates, and the exchanges agree. The edge, if there is one, comes from:

  • Price shopping the home ML: Don’t settle for {odds:1.50} when {odds:1.64} exists in-market.
  • Comparing handicap vs ML: If you think Monza’s advantage shows up as a multi-goal win more often than the market implies, the -0.75 at {odds:1.82}/{odds:1.83} can be a cleaner expression than paying heavy ML juice.
  • Totals line selection: Decide whether you want 2.25 or 2.5, then make sure you’re not paying the worst price for it. This is where the Trap Detector’s “Over 2.25” nudge is worth noting, especially with the model total leaning 2.5.
  • Understanding +EV longshots: The EV Finder flagging Entella ML +6.0% at specific books is a reminder: value and likelihood aren’t the same thing. If you play longshots, play them when the price is wrong—never just because it’s a big number.

Want the cleanest view of where the market’s likely to converge by kickoff—sharp books vs soft books, exchanges vs sportsbooks, and which prices are stale? That’s exactly what ThunderBet is built for, and you’ll see it fastest with full access when you Subscribe to ThunderBet.

As always, bet within your means and treat every wager as a risk, not a receipt.

AI Analysis

Strong 78%
Monza enters the match in elite form (4 wins in last 5) and ranks 2nd in the table, while Virtus Entella is struggling in 18th place and has not won an away match all season (0-4-9).
Virtus Entella has a major defensive vulnerability, conceding 37 goals compared to Monza's league-best 19, and they are coming off back-to-back heavy losses (1-3 and 0-3).
Market pricing at {odds:1.65} for the home win is slightly generous given the massive discrepancy in home/away splits; Monza's probability of victory is modeled near 65-68%.

This is a classic 'top vs bottom' matchup in Serie B. Monza is pushing for automatic promotion and has turned their home stadium into a fortress with strong defensive organization (10 clean sheets). Conversely, Virtus Entella is arguably the worst …

Get the edge on every game.

Professional-grade betting analytics across 82+ sportsbooks.

82+ books +EV finder Trap detector AI assistant Alerts
Get Started