A weirdly spicy late-night Metro spot: Penguins rolling, Devils reeling… and the total getting squeezed
This is one of those Devils vs Penguins games where the standings vibes say “Pittsburgh at home, don’t overthink it,” but the betting market keeps whispering: slow down. Pittsburgh has gone 7-3 in their last 10 and they’re coming off a 5-2 road win in Buffalo, while New Jersey limps in on a 4-game losing streak and has looked allergic to finishing chances lately. On the surface, you’re staring at a classic form mismatch.
But the interesting part — the part you can actually bet — is how the market is pricing the Penguins without their usual top-line identity. Sidney Crosby being on IR changes how books hang totals, how pucklines get shaded, and how the public reads Pittsburgh’s recent goal binges (6-5 vs the Rangers, 6-2 vs the Hawks). Meanwhile, New Jersey’s offense has been ice-cold (2.1 goals scored per game over the last five), which is exactly the kind of profile that drags a total down even if both teams have defensive warts.
If you’re searching “New Jersey Devils vs Pittsburgh Penguins odds” or “Penguins Devils spread,” this is the key: the moneyline is reasonably stable, but the total and alt-prices have been the real story. And if you like reading market tea leaves, this matchup has just enough conflicting signals to create mispriced pockets across books.
Matchup breakdown: ELO gap, form gap, and a style clash that matters more without Crosby
Start with the macro: Pittsburgh’s ELO sits at 1528 vs New Jersey at 1434. That’s a meaningful difference, and it matches what you’ve seen recently — Penguins are playing confident hockey (3-2 in the last five, 7-3 last 10), Devils are stuck in mud (1-4 last five, 4-6 last 10) with four straight losses.
Now the micro, because that’s where bettors get paid. Pittsburgh’s last-five scoring profile is loud: 3.6 goals scored / 3.2 allowed. That’s not “shutdown Pens,” that’s “track meet potential,” especially at home where they’ve had those 6-goal outbursts. New Jersey’s last-five profile is the opposite: 2.1 scored / 3.1 allowed. That’s the painful combo — you’re not defending well and you’re not finishing.
So why isn’t this just a simple “Pittsburgh rolls” handicap? Because Crosby’s absence tends to do two things at once:
- It lowers Pittsburgh’s ceiling in terms of sustained zone time and high-danger looks (especially at 5v5).
- It can tighten their game structurally — more conservative entries, fewer high-risk passes, and more reliance on blue-line activation and special teams.
And the Devils? Their best version is speed through the neutral zone and a power play that can flip a game even when they’re playing poorly. The problem is “best version” hasn’t shown up: over the last 10 they’ve been hovering around two goals a night, and you can’t live on perimeter looks forever.
The sneaky note on Pittsburgh’s side is Kris Letang being activated. That matters because if Pittsburgh’s going to generate offense without Crosby, it often comes from transition — quick ups, weak-side seams, and D-men joining as the fourth man. Letang improves the quality of those sequences, which is relevant for both sides of the total: he can create chances, but he also cleans up exits that reduce extended defensive-zone time.