Serie A - Italy
Mar 2, 7:45 PM ET UPCOMING

Fiorentina

4W-6L
VS

Udinese

3W-7L
Odds format

Fiorentina vs Udinese Odds, Picks & Predictions — Monday, March 02, 2026

Fiorentina travel to Udinese with the market leaning Viola. Here’s what the odds, ELO, and ThunderBet signals say about where value may hide.

ThunderBet ThunderBet
Feb 23, 2026 Updated Feb 23, 2026

Odds Comparison

82+ sportsbooks
Bovada
ML
Spread -0.25 +0.25
Total 2.5
Pinnacle
ML
Spread -0.25 +0.25
Total 2.5
BetRivers
ML
Spread --
Total 2.5
BetMGM
ML
Spread --
Total 2.5

A Monday night spot where both teams can’t afford another “almost”

This is the kind of Serie A Monday that looks quiet until you actually zoom in. Udinese are sitting on that uncomfortable edge where performances aren’t disastrous, but the results keep slipping—two straight losses, 3 wins in their last 10, and just 1.2 goals scored per match on the season profile. Fiorentina aren’t exactly flying either (4-6 last 10), but they’ve been more capable of manufacturing goals (1.6 scored per match) and they come in off a win—exactly the sort of “we’re back” narrative the public loves to buy.

That’s why Fiorentina vs Udinese odds are interesting tonight: the market is shading toward the visitors even though the underlying gap isn’t huge. ELO has Fiorentina at 1497 and Udinese at 1482—basically a coin-flip matchup on paper once you account for home field. Yet the price is telling you Fiorentina are the cleaner side, with most books hanging them around the {odds:2.25}–{odds:2.34} range on the moneyline. If you’re hunting “Udinese Fiorentina spread” or “Fiorentina vs Udinese picks predictions,” this is exactly the type of game where you don’t want to bet the headline—bet the shape of the market.

And the shape here says: Fiorentina are trusted a little more, but not enough for books to be aggressive with the handicap. That tension is where bettors can find value—especially in Asian lines and totals, where the pricing gets more nuanced than a 1X2 number.

Matchup breakdown: small ELO gap, big questions about control and finishing

Start with the blunt form context. Udinese: 3W-7L in the last 10, and they’ve allowed 1.5 per match while scoring 1.2. Fiorentina: 4W-6L last 10, allowing 1.5 while scoring 1.6. Neither defense has been a wall lately, which is why the total market is so relevant here (more on that in a second). But the bigger difference is that Fiorentina’s profile gives them more paths to goals—if they’re not dominant, they can still nick two. Udinese, more often, need the game to land in a narrower script.

That’s what makes the -0.25 Asian line intriguing. At Bovada, Fiorentina -0.25 is priced {odds:1.98} with Udinese +0.25 at {odds:1.85}. Pinnacle is similar: Fiorentina -0.25 at {odds:2.02}, Udinese +0.25 at {odds:1.87}. A quarter-goal line is basically the market saying, “Fiorentina are a touch better, but a draw is very live.” That aligns with the ELO spread being only 15 points—tight enough that game state and finishing variance can swing it quickly.

If you’re thinking in practical terms: Udinese’s best version of this match is to keep it from becoming stretched. They’ve shown they can win low-scoring home games (that 1-0 vs Roma stands out), but they’ve also dropped winnable spots recently (1-2 vs Sassuolo at home, 1-2 away at Lecce). Fiorentina have been more volatile—2-2 with Torino, 1-2 losses to Napoli and Cagliari—but they’ve also pulled away wins on the road (2-1 at Como, 2-1 at Bologna). That road competence matters when the market is already leaning their way.

So stylistically, you’re betting the script: does Udinese succeed in dragging Fiorentina into a tight, lower-event match, or does Fiorentina’s extra scoring gear force Udinese to chase? The total pricing suggests books expect goals to be available, but not guaranteed.

EV Finder Spotlight

Unknown +2.8% EV
h2h at 1xBet ·
Unknown +2.8% EV
h2h at 1xBet ·
More +EV edges detected across 82+ books +4.1% EV

Betting market analysis: what the 1X2 and -0.25 are really saying

Let’s talk “Fiorentina vs Udinese odds” across the board. DraftKings has Fiorentina {odds:2.25}, Udinese {odds:2.95}, Draw {odds:3.20}. FanDuel is similar with Fiorentina {odds:2.30}, Udinese {odds:3.10}, Draw {odds:3.30}. BetMGM posts Fiorentina {odds:2.30}, Udinese {odds:3.00}, Draw {odds:3.40}. The most efficient market snapshot is usually Pinnacle: Fiorentina {odds:2.34}, Udinese {odds:3.21}, Draw {odds:3.34}.

Two takeaways:

  • The draw is priced as a real outcome. With draw numbers sitting {odds:3.20}–{odds:3.40}, books aren’t forcing you into an “either/or” match. That’s consistent with the -0.25 handicap being the main dividing line.
  • There’s no obvious disagreement between books. When you see tight clustering like this, it often means the market has found equilibrium—at least on the surface.

And that’s where you should be careful. “No significant movements detected” sounds boring, but it can be informative: it suggests there hasn’t been a major information shock (late injury news, surprise lineup leak) or a big wave of respected money forcing a reprice. If you’re the type who follows steam, the Odds Drop Detector not flagging anything meaningful tells you you’re not late to a party—you’re looking at a market that’s been relatively stable.

Now the totals. We’ve got Over 2.5 showing around {odds:1.73} at BetRivers, {odds:1.74} at BetMGM, {odds:1.80} at Bovada, and a notably higher {odds:2.06} at Pinnacle. That difference is not noise. Either Pinnacle is shading the other side (and you’re getting a better Over price there), or the “Over” at some books is being taxed because that’s where public money naturally flows in these mid-table matches with leaky recent form.

If you’re trying to interpret “Udinese Fiorentina betting odds today” like a sharper: the total market is the one showing the most interesting dispersion. The 1X2 is tight; the O/U has a real range in price. That’s exactly the kind of spot where you want to compare books instead of settling for whatever your first app shows you.

As for traps: I’m not seeing the classic profile of a trap line (where one side looks “too good to be true” and sharp books disagree). Still, when the public sees Fiorentina priced around {odds:2.25} and thinks “value,” that’s where you should sanity-check with the Trap Detector—especially if the draw price stays firm while the away price shortens. A stubborn draw number often signals the market respects the stalemate more than casual bettors do.

Value angles: where ThunderBet’s signals suggest the market might be mispriced

Here’s the practical part—how you can use ThunderBet analytics without turning this into a guessing contest.

First, price shopping matters in this match more than usual because the market is “quiet.” When there’s no big line move to chase, your edge often comes from simply having the best number. Pinnacle’s Fiorentina {odds:2.34} is materially better than DraftKings’ {odds:2.25} for the same outcome. If you’re playing 1X2, that’s the difference between a bet that’s merely a lean and a bet that might actually clear your required edge threshold.

Second, keep an eye on the total. Over 2.5 at Pinnacle is {odds:2.06} while other books are sitting in the {odds:1.73}–{odds:1.80} range. That gap is big enough that it can flip the entire expected value of the same bet depending on where you place it. This is exactly what our EV Finder is built for: it scans 82+ sportsbooks and flags when one book is out of line with the broader market consensus.

On that note, ThunderBet is currently showing +EV opportunities tied to the 1X2 market at 1xBet (EV +2.8%). The feed labels the selection as “Unknown” on the book-side mapping, which usually means the market name is coming through but the team/draw token needs a clean match. In plain English: there’s an edge flagged in that 1X2 menu, but you should verify whether it’s Fiorentina, Udinese, or the draw before firing. The easiest way is to open the event in the AI Betting Assistant and ask it to reconcile the flagged market with the live 1xBet listing—takes 20 seconds and saves you from betting the wrong side of a data label.

Third, look for convergence. When we talk about “exchange consensus vs sportsbook lines,” the idea is simple: if sharper pricing sources (like low-margin books and exchange-like markets) are implying one probability, and a recreational book is hanging a number that implies something meaningfully different, you’ve got a potential misprice. ThunderBet’s convergence signals (premium) are designed to highlight those moments where multiple independent sources agree. For this match, the surface market is stable, so the best value is more likely to show up as book-to-book discrepancy (like the Over 2.5 pricing) rather than a dramatic move.

If you’ve got full dashboard access, this is where it gets fun: you can compare the implied probabilities for Fiorentina {odds:2.34} vs {odds:2.25} and see how little “true” edge you need for the better number to matter over a season. That’s the kind of long-run discipline that pays for a Subscribe to ThunderBet quickly if you’re betting Serie A regularly.

Recent Form

Fiorentina
W
D
L
L
W
vs Como W 2-1
vs Torino D 2-2
vs Napoli L 1-2
vs Cagliari L 1-2
vs Bologna W 2-1
Udinese
L
L
W
?
W
vs Sassuolo L 1-2
vs Lecce L 1-2
vs AS Roma W 1-0
vs AS Roma ? N/A
vs Hellas Verona W 3-1
Key Stats Comparison
1497 ELO Rating 1482
1.6 PPG Scored 1.2
1.5 PPG Allowed 1.5
W1 Streak L2

Key factors to watch before you bet: lineups, game state, and the “draw tax”

Because the handicap is sitting at a quarter goal and the draw is priced as live, your biggest pre-match edge often comes from information timing.

  • Lineups and late scratches: In a tight ELO matchup (1497 vs 1482), one missing creator or one defensive rotation change can be worth more than the whole ELO gap. If you’re betting close to kickoff, re-check prices and see if any book is slow to react. That’s also when the Odds Drop Detector becomes valuable—late moves are often information-driven, not opinion-driven.
  • Home/away script: Udinese have shown they can win at home in low-scoring scripts (1-0 vs Roma), but they’ve also been punished when matches open up. If you expect Fiorentina to control possession and tempo, the -0.25 line makes more sense than pure 1X2 because it prices the draw differently.
  • The “public bias” toward the bigger name: Fiorentina typically attract more casual money than Udinese. That doesn’t automatically mean the line is wrong—just that you should be more demanding on price. If your only option is Fiorentina {odds:2.25}, you’re paying more tax than if you can grab {odds:2.34}.
  • Total goals pricing tells you what the market fears: With Over 2.5 priced as low as {odds:1.73} at some shops, books are acknowledging the chance this gets to three goals. But Pinnacle offering {odds:2.06} suggests the sharpest market isn’t as eager to tax the Over. That disagreement is a clue: either Pinnacle is tempting Over money, or the other books are shading Over because they expect public demand.
  • Schedule and motivation: Monday night spots can be weird—teams know the weekend results, and that can change the risk appetite. If a draw feels “acceptable” in the table context, it can slow the match late. That’s another reason the draw number being firm matters.

If you want a clean, bet-ready view, pull up the match in ThunderBet and compare (1) best available 1X2 price, (2) the -0.25 split, and (3) how totals pricing differs by book. That “three-angle check” catches most mistakes bettors make when they rely on one market only. And if you’re serious about turning these small edges into a season-long approach, you’ll want the premium convergence and ensemble signals—another good reason to Subscribe to ThunderBet and unlock the full picture instead of betting off one screen.

How I’d approach this card if you’re betting tonight

I’m not here to hand you a scripted pick—this match doesn’t deserve that kind of confidence. What it does deserve is a process.

Step one: decide whether you’re betting match result or match script. If you think Fiorentina’s extra scoring path matters, the Asian -0.25 markets (Fiorentina {odds:1.98} to {odds:2.02}, Udinese {odds:1.85} to {odds:1.87}) can be a smarter expression than a raw 1X2 because it reduces how punishing a draw can be depending on side. If you think this stays cagey, then the draw and totals become more relevant than the away moneyline.

Step two: shop numbers. Fiorentina {odds:2.34} vs {odds:2.25} is not a rounding error. Over 2.5 at {odds:2.06} vs {odds:1.73} is a completely different bet.

Step three: let ThunderBet do what it does best—find the misprices. Run the event through the EV Finder and use the AI Betting Assistant to sanity-check any flagged edges (especially if a book feed labels a selection generically). If a late move finally hits, the Odds Drop Detector will tell you whether you’re seeing real steam or just noise.

That’s how you stay disciplined in a matchup where the teams are close, the draw is live, and the best edge might be as simple as having the best price in a stable market.

As always, bet within your means.

Get the edge on every game.

Professional-grade betting analytics across 82+ sportsbooks.

82+ books +EV finder Trap detector AI assistant Alerts
Get Started